Judicial Review

Judicial review for migration matters refers to the process by which decisions made by government authorities in immigration and visa-related issues are reviewed by a court. In Australia, this typically involves the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or the Federal Court of Australia. Judicial review ensures that government decisions are lawful, fair, and consistent with administrative law principles.

Or Call on +61 423 097 613

Grounds for Review:

Judicial review can be sought on various grounds, including errors of law, procedural irregularities, unreasonableness, and irrationality in the decision-making process.

Scope of Review:

The court examines whether the decision-maker acted within their legal authority, followed the correct procedures, and made a decision that is reasonable in the circumstances.

Legal Representation:

Applicants can be represented by lawyers during judicial review proceedings to present their case effectively and navigate the complexities of administrative and migration law.

Our process

Key aspects of judicial review for migration matters include:

A successful judicial review can result in the decision being overturned, leading to a favourable outcome for the applicant. However, unsuccessful reviews may uphold the original decision, leading to potential further legal recourse or avenues for appeal.

Judicial review in migration matters serves to scrutinize decisions made by government authorities, ensuring they adhere to legal standards and administrative law principles. This process helps uphold fairness and legality in the treatment of visa applicants and immigrants.

Courts, such as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or the Federal Court of Australia, assess whether decisions on visas, deportations, or refugee status meet the requirements set out in legislation and established case law. This includes evaluating procedural fairness and the reasonableness of decisions.

The court may affirm, set aside, or vary the original decision made by the government authority. If the decision is set aside, the matter may be remitted back to the decision-maker for reconsideration.